ricardienne: (christine)
[personal profile] ricardienne
The Borrower, Rebecca Makkai (fiction, American picaresque).

I should't like this book. I mean that I ought not to like it. By that, I mean that there is a moral (or maybe an aesthetic) criterion by which I should find this novel wanting: an idealistic young librarian, recently out of her East Coast liberal arts college and minding the children's desk in a small-minded red-state town in the Bible Belt -- are your hackles up already? This is unfair representation, elite stereotyping, a snooty liberal disdain factory manufacturing progressive pablum. Aren't we obligated to be above all that? Book-burning bible-thumpers are kind of trite, after all, especially when they're also Stepford-ly suburban. "People are always more complicated," "you don't even know their hopes and dreams", "individuals," etc.

You know all this. I know all this. Rebecca Makkai knows all this, and even her heroine Lucy Hull, that aforementioned nice liberal idealist (put on your cynicism glasses -- now), learns it, sort of. And yet sometimes, you want something comforting, like the children's section of the library before all the complications of "Middle School" and "YA," back when there weren't any sequels to The Giver and "Junie B. Jones" was the stupidest trend in beginning chapter books anyone could think of, and you didn't have to worry that maybe you were imposing your socio-culturally hegemonic (not to mention historically specific and relative) progressive values on decent people if you kidnapped their precocious and charismatic 10-year-old son just because they censored his reading and were preemptively sending him to anti-gay weekend school, where there was no evidence of abuse or actual harm, just objectionable child-rearing choices (and everyone needs to be free to make their own choices, don't you know?).*

Obviously, the post-modern door can't be closed, and even if I only read The Giver and Gathering Blue, the other two books will always be out there and there's no going back. Sometimes, though, a fantasy about picking up and leaving your boring tedious compromised life to dodge the police on a wacky road-trip after making a snap and probably-bad decision to make a grand noble gesture and save that precocious, funny, excited kid from the stifling influence of his parents, is exactly what one wants. Okay, so the literary references and the librarian-angst are a little tiresome after a while, and the tone hovers anxiously between earnest and painfully self-conscious (but whose doesn't, these days?), and I don't even know what to do with the Soviet Russia/Russian Mafia finding-your-identity subplot.** But I was completely hooked, completely taken by Ian, completely involved in Lucy's zany adventures, and completely entertained for a couple of hours.

CONCLUSION: Would recommend, but only to a certain kind of person.

*I do think it's significant that the Drakes and their pastor are in no way portrayed as heinously evil, just as creating a small-minded warped environment that will ultimately probably harm their son. But don't worry -- Lucy has to interrogate her assumptions, too, at some point.

**One practical thing it did was smooth over the plausibility holes. The fact that they were smoothed over may be a weakness.

Date: 2013-01-08 06:37 am (UTC)
ext_110: A field and low mountain of the Porcupine Hills, Alberta. (Default)
From: [identity profile] goldjadeocean.livejournal.com
Seriously, I love this post. I love this post so much. You are an awesome writer.

Date: 2013-01-09 01:52 am (UTC)

Date: 2013-01-09 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ricardienne.livejournal.com
Thank you! That's is a really nice thing to hear at the beginning of a semester!

Date: 2013-01-08 08:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] existentialgoat.livejournal.com
I feel like I might be the certain kind of person, because now I really want to read this book.

Date: 2013-01-09 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ricardienne.livejournal.com
I would be very interested to know what you thought about it! (I *think* you might like it, and insofar as it's a book about kids books, I think you would find it fun at least in parts.)

Date: 2013-01-08 07:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] achyvi.livejournal.com
... there are plural sequels to The Giver?! I can't decide whether to be horrified or curious. I remember Gathering Blue not being too bad... but maybe not great? It's been a while.

The book in question, though, sounds like it might be a nice way to while away an afternoon. So long as the religious fundie parts aren't too prominent... 'cos I get enough of that already. :/

Date: 2013-01-09 01:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] camlina.livejournal.com
Yeah, the most recent one (I believe the 4th in the series) just came out in October 2012. I haven't read that one, but I did read the previous two. They weren't terrible, but nothing amazing; The Giver is still heads and shoulders better.

The one big saving grace of the sequels is that they are only sortof sequels; it is only barely made clear that they are set in the same universe, and the characters of The Giver are only scarcely mentioned or not at all.

Date: 2013-01-09 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] achyvi.livejournal.com
I'm glad that they aren't all direct sequels. At least one can pretend that they are completely unrelated if they end up being awful!

Date: 2013-01-09 01:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ricardienne.livejournal.com
Those parts really aren't. It's mostly this wacky self-referential road trip with a precocious and manipulative 10-year-old...

Profile

ricardienne: (Default)
sigaloenta

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 04:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios